Wed

Jun 28
2006

Nat Torkington

Nat Torkington

Google Auth Launches

Google Authentication for Web Apps just launched. I got wind of this on my visit to the Google campus two weeks ago (more on this visit next week) and I'm glad they've rolled it out. This service lets you build a web app that uses Google's user accounts for user authentication. All the build-to-flip optimists will immediately adopt it, but the rest of us probably aren't willing to cede our users to Google just yet. The word I had from inside Google is that this is not an identity play, it's something they were developing for internal use and are offering externally to help people build add-ons to Google services (e.g., the documentation talks about a website with calendar data letting the users of the website add the dates to their Google Calendar). Expect Google Passport hysteria in the first week, followed by technologists finding real use cases thereafter. [Update 30Jun2006: looks like they pulled it (the link 404s). I'll update with more info when I have it.][Update 30Jun2006: link works again. Someone pulled the trigger too soon, it looks. It's up and out now, though.]


tags:   | comments: 6   | Sphere It
submit:

 
Previous  |  Next

0 TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blogs.oreilly.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/4746

Comments: 6

  Jens [06.29.06 05:07 AM]

the link appears to be dead...

  Jason [06.29.06 06:17 AM]

Link doesn't seem to work. Google's Overview page on Authentication [http://code.google.com/apis/accounts/Authentication.html] still shows the web proxy as an April release date. Their API for Installed apps is available, however.

  Brian [06.29.06 10:31 AM]

The link works for me.

  Nick [06.30.06 07:06 AM]

Looks a lot like Kerberos to me. I think if Google is interested in really expanding the market, they should let authentication go the other way - ie. accept tokens from third parties.

  Daniel Tschentscher [07.03.06 03:41 AM]

Why would anyone share his users with Google in the first place? I think this move only made sense if Google gave you a copy of the user data in return - which obviously is impossible because of privacy issues.

  cooper [07.04.06 09:19 PM]

I think nat missed the point here. The "point" is to allow applications temporary access to user data hosted by google (calendar, mail, photos, etc), to another site. Not to replace authentication at the third party site.

Post A Comment:

 (please be patient, comments may take awhile to post)






Type the characters you see in the picture above.